There’s something deeply troubling about the world we live in today, especially when it comes to the relationships between people who, on the surface, should have every reason to understand one another. We live in an age where communication has become easier than ever before. A person can sit in one part of the world and speak instantly to someone thousands of miles away. We can exchange photographs, videos, ideas, opinions, and personal experiences in seconds. Yet, despite having all of these tools that were supposed to bring us closer together, we often seem more divided than ever.
I’ve always believed in unity, and I’ve never seen that belief as something complicated. To me, unity doesn’t mean that everybody has to think the same way, vote the same way, worship the same way, or even agree on every issue. Unity simply means recognizing when we have common interests and understanding that there’s strength in cooperation. Somehow, though, even suggesting that people should come together has become controversial. The moment you encourage people to look beyond the labels that separate them, somebody is ready to argue about why unity can’t happen.
That’s where I find myself asking a question that seems almost unbelievable: when did unity become the enemy? When did it become easier to hate someone we’ve never met than to have a conversation with them? When did people become so emotionally attached to the divisions around them that they began defending the very walls that keep them separated?
I believe we have to take an honest look at how we got here. Division didn’t suddenly appear because human beings woke up one morning and decided that they no longer wanted to get along. Division can be encouraged, manufactured, exaggerated, and repeated until people begin to see one another through the eyes of someone else. If you can keep people focused on what separates them, you may never have to worry about what could happen if they discovered what they have in common.
That’s why this conversation is bigger than one country, one group, or one label. It’s about the way we think. It’s about how easily emotions can be manipulated. It’s about the technology that has entered every part of our lives. It’s about the images we’ve been taught to believe, the history we’ve been told to forget, and the question of whether we can ever rise above the divisions that have been placed in front of us.
DIVISION HAS ALWAYS BEEN A POWERFUL WEAPON
Throughout history, powerful people and institutions have understood something very simple: a divided population is easier to manage than a united one. When people are fighting among themselves, they have less time to examine the forces affecting their lives. When communities become suspicious of one another, cooperation becomes difficult. When every disagreement turns into a permanent battle, the people involved can become so distracted that they forget the original problems they were supposed to solve.
We’ve seen this happen repeatedly throughout history. Organizations have been weakened by internal conflict. Movements have been damaged by mistrust. People have been encouraged to turn against one another, sometimes because of real disagreements and sometimes because those disagreements were deliberately magnified. Rumors, fear, jealousy, ambition, and ego can all be used to weaken a group from within. The danger is that once people become consumed by internal conflict, they may no longer recognize how much energy they’re spending fighting one another while larger forces continue operating without interruption.
Years ago, creating that kind of confusion required a great deal of effort. People had to physically infiltrate organizations, gather information, spread rumors, and create distrust face to face. Today, much of that can happen through a screen. We live in a world where millions of people willingly share their thoughts, emotions, fears, relationships, arguments, locations, photographs, and personal information every single day. What once required physical proximity can now happen through technology that most of us carry in our pockets.
I’m not saying that every piece of technology was created for the purpose of controlling us. That would be too simple of an explanation for a much more complicated world. But I am saying that we’ve become extremely comfortable with systems that we barely understand. We often accept convenience without thinking about what we’re giving away in exchange. Our phones have become extensions of our bodies. We wake up and reach for them. We check them before going to sleep. We use them to communicate, manage money, share memories, conduct business, find directions, watch entertainment, and express our deepest emotions. The same device that connects us to the people we love can also collect enormous amounts of information about how we live.
The question we should ask isn’t whether technology is good or bad. The real question is whether we understand the power of the tools we use. If a system knows what makes you angry, it can continue showing you things that make you angry. If it knows what you fear, it can repeatedly place that fear in front of you. If it knows what makes you feel superior, insecure, jealous, or rejected, those emotions can become part of the information used to keep your attention. And attention has become one of the most valuable commodities in the modern world.
SOCIAL MEDIA DIDN’T CREATE EVERY PROBLEM, BUT IT LEARNED HOW TO PROFIT FROM THEM
Social media didn’t invent human disagreement. Families argued before there were smartphones. Communities had internal conflicts before there was the internet. People had prejudices, jealousies, and misunderstandings long before anyone could post a video online. But social media created something different: a worldwide stage where conflict can be amplified, rewarded, and repeated around the clock.
The most extreme voices often receive the greatest attention. The calm explanation can get buried beneath the loud accusation. A thoughtful conversation may attract little interest while an insulting video spreads across the internet within hours. People quickly learn what gets attention, and once attention becomes connected to money, influence, or popularity, the temptation to become more outrageous becomes even stronger. That’s how we end up living in a world where a short video clip can convince people that they understand an entire group of people.
Someone says something offensive, and suddenly millions of viewers are encouraged to believe that the person represents an entire culture, country, nationality, or community. Before long, people who have never met one another are carrying hatred based on an algorithmically delivered image. We have to become smarter than that. Not every disagreement deserves a war. Not every offensive person represents millions of others. Not every viral video contains the full story. Yet, we’re constantly being pushed to react before we think. We’re encouraged to choose a side immediately, defend it aggressively, and treat anyone who sees things differently as an enemy.
That emotional environment is perfect for division because once people become addicted to outrage, they begin looking for new reasons to be angry. Every day requires a new target. Every disagreement needs a villain. Every conversation becomes a competition. And while people are spending hours fighting strangers online, the larger issues affecting their lives continue quietly in the background.
THE PROBLEM WITH THINKING TOO SMALL
One of the things that troubles me most is how easily we allow geography to erase our sense of connection. A person can move from one location to another and somehow be treated as though they’ve become an entirely different human being. Think about your own family. If one of your brothers moved to another state, would he stop being your brother? If your sister moved across the country, would she suddenly become unrelated to you? If members of your family lived in different cities, would you tell them that they could no longer attend the family reunion because they crossed a state line?
Of course not. Yet, when we discuss people whose histories stretch across continents and centuries, we suddenly become convinced that modern borders have erased every possible connection. We begin arguing over who belongs where, who has the right to identify with whom, and whose history matters more. That way of thinking is too narrow for me.
Human beings have always moved. Families have spread across regions. People have crossed oceans. Empires have risen and fallen. Borders have been created, erased, and moved countless times throughout history. The political map we see today isn’t the map that existed centuries ago, and it won’t necessarily be the map that exists centuries from now. So why should we allow temporary political lines to completely erase the larger connections that history, ancestry, culture, and human experience may have created?
I can be proud of where I was born without hating where someone else was born. I can appreciate my culture without believing that every other culture is inferior. I can recognize my personal history while remaining open to the possibility that my story connects to something much larger. That’s not weakness. That’s having enough confidence to understand that identity doesn’t have to be a prison.
AFRICA IS MORE THAN THE IMAGE MANY PEOPLE WERE TAUGHT TO BELIEVE
Living on the African continent has given me an opportunity to see things with my own eyes instead of depending entirely on images created by other people. For years, many people outside of Africa have been given a very narrow picture of what the continent represents. The same images are repeated over and over again: poverty, hunger, disease, war, suffering, and desperation. Those things exist. There are places where people struggle. There are communities facing serious challenges. There are political problems, economic difficulties, and corruption. But reducing an entire continent to its worst conditions is dishonest.
Africa is vast. It contains many nations, cultures, languages, traditions, environments, and ways of life. It has enormous natural resources, growing cities, young populations, creative people, entrepreneurs, farmers, workers, artists, and families who are living their lives in ways that rarely make international headlines. The problem with propaganda is that it doesn’t always have to be completely false. Sometimes it only has to be incomplete.
If you show the worst conditions in one place while ignoring everything else, you can create almost any image you want. You could travel to the poorest areas of America, photograph addiction, homelessness, violence, and poverty, and convince someone who has never visited that the entire country looks that way. The same thing can be done anywhere. That’s why firsthand experience matters.
I’m not interested in pretending that one part of the world is perfect while another is hopeless. Every society has problems. The difference is that some problems are constantly placed in front of us while others are hidden behind carefully designed images. What I’ve discovered is that life becomes very different when you step outside of the mental picture you were given and begin observing things for yourself.
WE CAN LOVE WHERE WE COME FROM WITHOUT REJECTING EVERYONE ELSE
I was born and raised in New York City, and those experiences will always be part of me. The city shaped me. America shaped part of my understanding of the world. My family history shaped me. My connection to Ghana shaped me, and living here has given me experiences that have changed the way I see life. But I don’t believe that acknowledging one part of myself requires me to reject another.
That’s one of the traps we’ve fallen into. We’re often encouraged to choose one identity and defend it against every other identity. We’re told that pride requires hostility. We’re taught that if we recognize a connection with someone outside of our immediate category, we’re somehow betraying our own group. I reject that way of thinking.
You can love your hometown and still travel the world. You can love your country and still criticize its problems. You can be proud of your culture and still respect someone else’s culture. You can have a specific identity without turning that identity into a weapon against everyone else. For me, the world is too large to live inside such a small mental box.
We’ve been trained to think that we belong only to the little section of the planet where we happened to be born. But the Earth existed before modern countries, before modern flags, and before the political boundaries that now define so much of our thinking. That doesn’t mean nationality is meaningless. It means nationality shouldn’t be used to erase our ability to recognize larger human connections.
THE DANGER OF WAITING FOR SOMEONE ELSE TO SAVE YOU
Another problem we face is the tendency to place all of our hopes into the hands of systems that may never truly have our interests at heart. People can spend generations waiting for governments, politicians, institutions, or powerful individuals to finally do the right thing. Sometimes justice comes. Sometimes progress happens. But history has also shown us that powerful systems rarely give up power simply because people ask politely.
That’s why I believe we have to think beyond what someone else may eventually give us. There’s nothing wrong with demanding justice. There’s nothing wrong with discussing historical wrongs. But we shouldn’t become so focused on waiting for an outside solution that we forget the power we already possess when we learn how to work together. Unity can’t be printed by a government. Cooperation can’t be handed to us like a gift. Trust can’t be legislated into existence. Communities have to build those things for themselves.
Imagine what could happen if more people focused their energy on building relationships, supporting one another, creating businesses, sharing knowledge, protecting their communities, educating their children, and developing economic connections across the divisions that currently keep them apart. That kind of unity could become a form of wealth that no one could easily take away.
THE RAT RACE CAN MAKE YOU FORGET THAT YOU’RE ALIVE
One of the biggest changes in my own life has been learning how much stress I once accepted as normal. When you live inside a system for a long time, you may not realize how much of your energy is being consumed until you step outside of it. You wake up with responsibilities waiting for you. You go to work. You pay bills. You solve problems. You deal with traffic, rising prices, debt, emergencies, and constant pressure. You work hard to get ahead, and sometimes you look up years later and wonder where all the time went.
The bills don’t stop, the responsibilities don’t disappear, and the pressure continues. Somewhere along the way, many people forget what it feels like to simply enjoy being alive. I’m not suggesting that everyone should abandon their responsibilities or move to another country. That’s not the message. What I’m saying is that we need to question the idea that a life of constant exhaustion is automatically a successful life.
What’s the value of working endlessly if you have no time to enjoy the life you’re working so hard to maintain? What does success really mean if you’re constantly stressed, tired, angry, and disconnected from yourself? Those are questions that more of us need to ask. For me, one of the greatest forms of wealth has become time. Having time to think, having time to rest, having time to observe the world around me, and having the freedom to wake up and decide how I want to spend part of my day can be more valuable than many of the things we spend our entire lives chasing.
REDISCOVERING PEACE THROUGH A DIFFERENT WAY OF LIVING
There’s something powerful about slowing down enough to notice life again. Nature has a way of reminding us that the world existed before our schedules and will continue long after our social media arguments disappear. I’ve learned to appreciate the simple things around me. Birds appear at familiar times. Small creatures move through the yard. The weather changes. The landscape has its own rhythm. These things may seem ordinary, but when you’ve spent years living under constant pressure, ordinary peace can feel extraordinary.
Nature doesn’t care about your online popularity, how many people agree with your opinions, or whether you won an argument with a stranger. That realization can be freeing. We spend so much time trying to prove that we matter to people who may not even remember our names tomorrow. We argue, compete, compare ourselves, and sometimes carry grudges that do nothing except drain our energy. Eventually, you have to ask yourself whether the conflict is worth the price.
For me, protecting my peace has become non-negotiable. That doesn’t mean I hate people. It means I’ve learned that not everyone deserves unlimited access to my mind, my emotions, or my life. Some relationships exist only to create confusion. Some people thrive on negativity. Some friendships are based on convenience. Some individuals claim to support you while quietly hoping you fail. Learning to recognize those things isn’t bitterness. It’s maturity.
WE HAVE TO STOP ALLOWING OUR EMOTIONS TO BE USED AGAINST US
One of the greatest forms of control is emotional control. If someone can keep you angry, they can influence your decisions. If they can keep you afraid, they can limit your imagination. If they can constantly trigger your ego, they can encourage you to act against your own long-term interests. That’s why emotional discipline is so important.
We can’t respond to every insult, fight every person who disagrees with us, or allow strangers to determine our mood every day. We have to become more aware of what we’re allowing into our minds. Social media is filled with emotional bait. Somebody knows that if they say something outrageous enough, people will react. The more people react, the more attention the content receives, and the more attention it receives, the more valuable it becomes.
The person watching may believe they’re participating in an important struggle, while the people benefiting from the engagement may simply be counting views, followers, money, and influence. We have to learn when not to participate. Silence can sometimes be more powerful than reaction. Walking away can sometimes be more productive than winning an argument. Protecting your peace can sometimes be more important than proving your point.
UNITY DOESN’T REQUIRE US TO BECOME IDENTICAL
One of the biggest misunderstandings about unity is the belief that unity requires everybody to think exactly alike. That’s impossible, and honestly, it wouldn’t even be healthy. People will always have different experiences. We come from different places. We speak different languages. We have different traditions, beliefs, and opinions. Even members of the same family can disagree about major issues.
Unity doesn’t mean erasing those differences. It means learning how to work together despite them. We can disagree without becoming enemies. We can challenge one another without trying to destroy each other. We can have difficult conversations without turning every disagreement into a permanent separation. That’s a level of emotional maturity that many of us still need to develop.
We’ve become too comfortable with extreme thinking. Someone is either completely with us or completely against us. An idea is either entirely correct or completely worthless. A person is either a hero or an enemy. Real life doesn’t work that way, and human beings are more complicated than the labels we place on them.
I’M NO LONGER WAITING FOR EVERYONE TO UNDERSTAND
There was a time when I believed that if I explained myself clearly enough, eventually everyone would understand what I was trying to say. Life has taught me that this isn’t always true. Some people are committed to misunderstanding you. Some people have already decided who you are before you open your mouth. Some people need conflict because conflict gives their lives excitement. Others may benefit financially or socially from keeping division alive, while some people simply aren’t ready to question the ideas they’ve been taught.
I’ve learned to accept that. I’m not here to force anybody to think exactly like me. I can share my experiences. I can speak honestly about what I see. I can raise questions that may make people uncomfortable. But I can’t force anyone to change their mind. That responsibility belongs to them.
At this stage of my life, I’d rather spend my energy living than endlessly debating people who have no interest in understanding another perspective. I have too much to appreciate, too much left to learn, and too much life ahead of me to spend every day trapped inside somebody else’s negativity.
UNITY REQUIRES HONESTY, NOT BLINDNESS
Supporting unity doesn’t mean pretending that there are no problems among us. There are problems. There are betrayals. There’s corruption. There are people who will manipulate, exploit, and harm others. Those realities shouldn’t be ignored. But there’s a major difference between holding someone accountable and becoming consumed by hatred. There’s a difference between correcting a problem and destroying every relationship connected to it.
If we can’t criticize one another without becoming enemies, we’ll never grow. If we can’t disagree without trying to humiliate one another, we’ll never build trust. If every conversation turns into a competition over who is more intelligent, more authentic, more revolutionary, or more important, then ego will continue destroying the very unity we claim to want. Sometimes the strongest thing a person can do is listen, and sometimes growth begins when we admit that we may not know everything.
WHAT WOULD HAPPEN IF WE STOPPED DOING THE WORK OF OUR OWN DIVISION?
That’s the question I want people to think about. What would happen if we became more careful about the information we consume? What would happen if we stopped allowing short video clips to determine how we feel about millions of people? What would happen if we traveled more, listened more, and relied less on somebody else’s interpretation of the world? What would happen if we stopped waiting for someone else to rescue us?
I believe the possibilities are greater than many of us realize. The future will belong to people who learn how to build while others remain distracted by endless arguments. It will belong to people who create relationships, exchange knowledge, support communities, and develop economic independence. The world is changing quickly, and emotional confusion can become a serious weakness.
We need clear minds, discipline, patience, and the ability to think beyond the next viral controversy. More than anything, we need to understand the difference between real threats and manufactured distractions.
MY PEACE IS NOT SOMETHING I’M WILLING TO GIVE AWAY
As I grow older, I’ve become much more protective of the peace I’ve worked hard to find. I don’t need everybody to approve of my choices. I don’t need to convince people that the life I’m living is real. I know what I experience every day, and that’s enough for me.
There’s a kind of wealth that can’t always be measured by the amount of money you have. It’s the ability to wake up and have some control over your time. It’s the ability to think clearly without constant pressure. It’s having space to breathe, create, reflect, and enjoy the simple experiences that make life meaningful. That’s the kind of wealth I value more now.
I wish people well, even when we disagree. I don’t have to hate someone because they chose a different path. But I also don’t have to allow negativity, jealousy, dishonesty, or manipulation into my personal space. Peace requires boundaries, and sometimes the people who become angry when you establish those boundaries are the very people who benefited from you not having them before.
THE REAL QUESTION IS WHETHER WE CAN CHANGE THE WAY WE THINK
Maybe expecting the entire world to unite tomorrow is unrealistic. Perhaps the larger transformation begins with something much more personal. Can we stop allowing ourselves to be manipulated into hating people we’ve never met? Can we stop confusing disagreement with betrayal? Can we recognize that somebody else’s identity doesn’t threaten our own? Can we learn to be proud without becoming hostile? Can we understand that the world is larger than the mental boxes we’ve been taught to live inside?
Those are the questions that matter to me. I don’t claim to have every answer. I’m still learning. I’m still observing. I’m still questioning things that I once accepted without thinking. But I do know that endless hatred hasn’t brought us closer to freedom. Constant division hasn’t made us stronger. And spending every day fighting one another hasn’t solved the deeper problems that continue to affect our lives.
At some point, we have to be willing to try something different.
UNITY IS NOT THE ENEMY
Unity should never have become something that people fear. Wanting to connect with others across borders, cultures, and different histories doesn’t mean erasing anyone’s identity. It means recognizing that there may be more connecting us than the forces benefiting from our division want us to believe.
We can preserve our cultures and still cooperate. We can disagree and still communicate. We can be proud of our individual histories without pretending that everyone outside of our immediate group is irrelevant. We can protect ourselves without becoming prisoners of fear. The first step is becoming aware of manipulation. The next step is deciding that we will no longer automatically react every time someone pushes our emotional buttons.
The world won’t suddenly become perfect, and there will always be people who profit from conflict. There will always be voices telling us who to hate, what to fear, and why somebody else is responsible for everything wrong in our lives. But we still have the power to decide what we allow into our minds.
We can choose what we watch, what we share, and how we respond. We can decide who deserves access to our energy. We can choose whether every disagreement deserves our attention. Most importantly, we can decide whether we want to spend our lives building connections or destroying them.
I’ve made my choice. I choose peace, growth, freedom, and meaningful connection. I choose to keep my mind open and to recognize humanity beyond the labels that people use to divide us. I don’t expect everyone to agree with me, and I no longer feel the need to convince them. I can only speak honestly about what I see, live according to what I believe, and allow my life to reflect the choices I’ve made.
If unity has somehow become frightening, then maybe we need to ask ourselves why. Maybe we should look deeper into who benefits when we distrust one another. Maybe we should question why we’ve become so comfortable fighting people who may have more in common with us than we realize. Because the day we stop allowing ourselves to be manipulated into doing the work of those who benefit from keeping us apart may be the day we finally discover just how powerful we could become.
SCURV
